BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT
NYSE · BAM
Loading your favourites…

Brookfield Asset Management: Capital, fees
and discipline.

By · Research and review process

Company information centre · Asset-management operations, fee earnings and key metrics.

Research updated · 19 Oct 2026 / USD

Reported financial summary

Annual history of the reported asset-management platform. Period-end fee-bearing capital and full-year earnings/fundraising are distinct measures; ownership and platform scope can change.

Fee-bearing capital
602.714US$bn · 2025 · At 31 December
FRE per share
1.84US$ per share · 2025 · Full year ended 31 December
Distributable earnings per share
1.65US$ per share · 2025 · Full year ended 31 December
Fundraising · capital raised
111.7US$bn · 2025 · Full year ended 31 December
Definitions, sources and limitations
  • Fee-bearing capital Year-end capital that earns fees, on the reported asset-management platform scope. Bars are rounded to US$bn; the table preserves the reported US$m precision. Changes include market values, acquisitions and mandates as well as capital flows; this is not an organic-growth series. Reported platform scope. BAM Q4 2025 Supplemental Information Page 27
  • FRE per share Company-reported non-GAAP annual figures, not GAAP EPS. 2021–22 use published full-period asset-management-business comparisons before the December 2022 listing. Per-share presentation changes from period-end diluted shares in the 2023 supplement to weighted-average diluted shares in the 2025 supplement. The 2025 ownership restructuring is not treated as organic earnings growth. Company-reported per-share basis; weighted-average diluted shares. BAM Q4 2025 Supplemental Information Page 4
  • Distributable earnings per share Company-reported non-GAAP annual figures, not GAAP EPS. 2021–22 use published full-period asset-management-business comparisons before the December 2022 listing. Per-share presentation changes from period-end diluted shares in the 2023 supplement to weighted-average diluted shares in the 2025 supplement. The 2025 ownership restructuring is not treated as organic earnings growth. Company-reported per-share basis; weighted-average diluted shares. BAM Q4 2025 Supplemental Information Page 4
  • Fundraising · capital raised Full-year reported capital raised, not quarterly fundraising or net fee-bearing inflows. 2024 includes a US$49bn American Equity Life insurance mandate, so the movement into 2025 is not a like-for-like organic comparison. Earlier figures are rounded and come from the predecessor platform. Full-year total fundraising. BAM Q4 2025 Supplemental Information Page 7

Figures use the same dataset as the interactive history, displayed in the stated units with up to six decimal places. Reporting periods are not editorial review dates. Missing values are not zero. Date definitions · Published corrections

Business overview

Brookfield Asset Management manages capital for investors across infrastructure, renewable power, real estate, private equity and credit. It earns management fees and, where its agreements provide for them, performance-related income from the funds and other vehicles it manages. Its business is organising and managing investments, while the underlying assets and operating businesses belong to those investment vehicles.

Company overview ↗

The reported snapshot

30 Jun 2026 / trailing year
Fee-bearing capital
US$672bn
+19% year over year · period-end

Earnings per diluted share

US$1.97 FRE
Last twelve months

US$1.75 DE
Last twelve months

58% FRE margin
At BAM’s economic share

Non-GAAP company-defined measures. FRE, DE and GAAP EPS are different. BAM Q2 2026 supplement ↗

Which Brookfield?This page covers BAM, the asset manager. BN owns operating and investment interests and insurance exposure. A portfolio holding labelled Brookfield Corporation must not be treated as BAM.

Understand the three layers.

Updated · 19 Oct 2026

Customers pay an operating business. Investors own that business through a vehicle. BAM earns fees for managing the capital. These are three different cash flows.

A railway receives transport charges; a fund or listed affiliate holds an interest in the railway; BAM receives contractual management fees. The railway’s whole revenue is not BAM’s revenue, and its whole asset value is not BAM shareholder equity.

BAM · the manager

Earns management fees, certain incentive distributions and performance income, then pays staff and operating costs. FRE measures the recurring fee business under BAM’s definition.

BN · the wider group

Owns investment and operating interests, an interest in BAM and insurance exposure. An ownership return at BN differs from a management fee at BAM.

Vehicles · where capital is invested

Listed affiliates, private funds and mandates hold investments for their owners. Investors bear investment losses; BAM still faces reduced fees, reputational damage and weaker future fundraising.

Asset type and legal structure are different questions. Infrastructure describes what is owned. A listed company or a fixed-life private fund describes how ownership is organised. The same strategy can use several structures.

Open Company history below for the company’s evolution. Financial history contains the annual comparisons; Strategies & vehicles explains investment businesses, ownership structures and the dated fee mix. Existing charts and historical observations remain below.

BAM Q2 2026 supplement ↗
Company history · 1899 to the modern manager

From asset owner to asset manager.

The group dates to 1899; today’s separately listed BAM dates to 2022. This is group history leading to the modern manager.

1899 · Essential-service origins

Canadian investors establish São Paulo Tramway, Light and Power in Brazil. The group’s roots are in operating electricity and transport assets, rather than charging investment-management fees.

1969–1979 · Brascan and Edper

The Brascan name combines Brasil and Canada. Edper takes control in 1979; the organisation develops into a broader investment group.

1996 · Expansion in US property

Acquisitions from distressed Olympia & York expand the property platform. A financially stressed owner can hold useful assets; financing and acquisition price still determine the result.

2001–2005 · Managing outside capital

The first private equity fund closes in 2001. Bruce Flatt becomes CEO in 2002. Brascan becomes Brookfield Asset Management in 2005. Outside capital expands investment capacity and creates fee income.

2008–2016 · Specialist listed platforms

Infrastructure launches in 2008, Renewable in 2011, Property Partners in 2013 and Business Partners in 2016. Dedicated platforms bring distinct assets, investors, financing and fee arrangements.

2019 · Oaktree adds credit capabilities

Brookfield acquires a majority interest in Oaktree. Credit analysis and distressed-investment expertise broaden the strategies available to clients.

2021 · Property Partners taken private

The ordinary-equity property platform ceases to be a listed counterpart to Infrastructure and Renewable. Property operations and private real estate funds continue.

December 2022 · BAM and BN become distinct listed companies

The old Brookfield Asset Management becomes Brookfield Corporation (BN). Newly listed BAM initially holds 25% of the underlying asset manager. Pre-2022 group accounts are not directly comparable with today’s BAM.

February 2025 · Manager ownership simplified

BAM comes to own 100% of the underlying asset-management company. BN receives BAM shares and holds approximately 73% immediately after the transaction. This changes the ownership structure, not an overnight expansion of managed assets.

March–October 2026 · Affiliate structures evolve

The Business Partners structure consolidates into BBUC in March. Renewable proposes combining BEP and BEPC; as of 19 October, remaining approvals are pending. A simpler share structure does not itself create more electricity or operating profit.

Second-order effect: operating experience can support investment sourcing and client trust. More commitments can support fees and specialist teams. Weak client outcomes can reverse that process, especially when clients receive too little cash back to recommit. This is an explanation of possible relationships, not a forecast.

Brookfield company history ↗ · Fund and ownership milestones ↗ · 2022 separation filing ↗ · 2025 ownership arrangement ↗

The flywheel and its failure points.

Research · 18 Oct 2026

BAM is the asset manager. Its clients own the funds; BAM earns fees. It is distinct from Brookfield Corporation (BN).

How the manager operates

  1. Operating knowledge, credit analysis and relationships inform investment sourcing and risk assessment.
  2. Realised returns after fees describe client outcomes. Those outcomes may affect future commitments; reputation alone is not evidence of outperformance.
  3. Capital comes from institutions, private wealth and insurance mandates. Distributions and fund runoff offset inflows when measuring net growth.
  4. Deployment can activate contractual fees. Revenue, operating costs and share-count changes determine fee earnings and distributable earnings per share.

This causal framework is interpretation, not a forecast or a promise of returns.

What we track, and why

Open a metric to connect the number with the flywheel, its risks and the next question to ask. Dated observations are snapshots; monitoring fields without verified values are labelled.

2021–2025 · Annual history

Five years of operating metrics

Choose a metric to see the five latest completed financial years. The June 2026 snapshots below remain separate from this annual series.

Fee-bearing capital
Loading annual history…

Exact values, reporting basis and sources

Fund performance after fees and credit quality are tracked by strategy, fund and vintage. A comparable single platform total has not been established for these monitoring fields; they are not represented as zero or combined into a bar.

Download five-year data ↓

History checked · 19 Oct 2026 · Page numbers refer to printed report pages.

Commitment → deployment → fees: a commitment is a promise to supply capital; deployment puts capital into investments. Some contracts charge on commitments, others activate fees when capital is invested. Fundraising and fee activation therefore need not occur together. Compare the Fundraising and Deployment explanations side by side below; uncalled commitments are not current fee revenue.

Loading metric explanations…

What could break the cycle?

Credit losses and rising yields

New lending can earn more, but borrowers pay more. Track defaults, non-accruals, PIK and interest coverage. Rising yields can also reduce existing fixed-rate bond values.

Fundraising and deployment

Weak distributions can leave clients unable to recommit. Undeployed commitments delay some fees; aggressive deployment can sacrifice quality.

Private valuations and exits

Reported fund IRRs can include unrealised marks. Slower sales delay cash returned to clients and realised carried interest.

Complexity, people and governance

Multiple managers and related-party mandates add integration and conflict risks. Marks’s judgement is one part of a team-based process, not a platform-wide guarantee.

Financing and hedges

Fixed-rate borrowing, swaps and currency hedges can protect specific cash flows. They expire and do not remove defaults, falling asset values or refinancing risk.

Share count and distributions

Diluted shares, actual dividends, DE and interest costs show how reported earnings and distributions relate to the ownership base. Client-fund AUM is distinct from BAM shareholder equity.

Research notebook · Separate fund results from manager earnings.